
Business Advisory
Business Advisory Services
Everything you need to help you launch your new business entity from business entity selection to multiple-entity business structures.
Table Of Contents
By Jason Watson, CPA
Posted Monday, August 5 2024
We might have thrown out some terms without slowing down to define them. According to IRS Revenue Ruling 2000-4,
Section 263(a) and § 1.263(a)-1(a) provide that no deduction is allowed for any amount paid out for permanent improvements or betterments made to increase the value of any property or estate. Section 1.263(a)-2(a) provides that capital expenditures include the cost of acquisition, construction, or erection of buildings, machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and similar property having a useful life substantially beyond the taxable year.
Cool. The things you buy that have a useful life substantially greater than one year are considered a capital expenditure (capex) and must be capitalized in most situations. What the heck is capitalized? Is this a grammar thing?
There is capitalization in finance, and perhaps even in the deal structure on your rental property (debt versus cash versus investors). In accounting, and in tax return preparation, capitalization is-
an accounting method in which a cost is included in an asset’s value and expensed over the asset’s useful life, rather than expensed in the period the cost was incurred. Capitalization recognizes a cash outlay as an asset on the balance sheet rather than an expense on the income statement.
Moreover, a capital improvement is an expenditure that increases a property’s value, useful life or adapts to new use. This is also referred to as betterments, restorations and adaptations. Fun!
Simply put- you can either expense or capitalize a purchase. Expensing the purchase is an immediate deduction and therefore reduction in taxable income. Capitalizing the purchase requires listing the asset on your fixed asset listing and expensing over time through depreciation.
Accelerated depreciation through bonus depreciation or Section 179, or both, can allow for an immediate deduction of an otherwise capital asset. We’ll talk about accelerated depreciation and Section 179 expensing in a bit on page xx.
The first step is determining what you are repairing or improving? The unit of property (UOP) is generally the entire building including its structural components. However, under the final tangibles regulations, the improvement versus repair analysis applies to the building structure and each of the key building systems separately. The building systems are the
So, 9 total if you also count the building structure itself.
The next step is to run through the three big safe harbors for rental property owners-
We discussed these in fine detail in an earlier section on page xx. De minimis is the class favorite since it is quite simple and covers most purchases or situations. However, small taxpayers and routine maintenance have some teeth, but are commonly overlooked by even the most experienced tax professionals.
If the expenditure falls under the betterment, restoration and adaptation tests, then it is considered a capital improvement, and therefore must be capitalized and depreciated (versus immediately deducted).
The final tangible property regulations define these terms in amazing detail, but here is a quick summary with the real estate investor in mind-
You can think of BRA or BAR when trying to remember these. No one thinks of ARB or RAB, however.
With reference to betterment and the word “material,” the IRS offers this-
The term “material” is not defined in the final tangibles regulations. Although the final tangibles regulations include examples that refer to percentage increases, these examples are provided to assist you in understanding the rules. These percentages are not intended to set a standard, for example, a particular percentage increase in square footage or capacity, for determining whether the amount paid is a “material” betterment. In determining whether a betterment is “material”, you should use common sense and reasonable judgment as applied to your own facts and circumstances.
Earlier we asked you to remember Example 25 when discussing Safe Harbor for Routine Maintenance where a property owner replaced 100 out of 300 windows, and the expenditure was deemed to be routine maintenance (repair) and not an improvement.
On one hand, the 100 of 300 is a very specific percentage. On the other hand, the IRS suggests that a hard number, or bright line as we like to say, does not exist. Regardless, the 33% should be a decent barometer as you navigate the improvement versus repair maze.
Wait! There’s more! Using the window example from page xx, if you replaced all 300 windows at once it would likely be a capital improvement. However, if you replace 100 each year for three years, you might be able to call it all routine maintenance under the safe harbor. Spreading things out also helps with cash flow. Possibly a win win, but don’t break out the bubbly quite yet. There would be some things to discuss and some risk to explore.
Keep in mind the mini loophole that is afforded to rental properties deemed to be nonresidential based on transient tenants or guests. There are some expanded Section 179 expensing opportunities.